The proverbial expression It takes two to tango applies here. Why Isn't Steve Bannon in Jail? Ask the Democrats. | The Nation (witness statement the gentleman who was behind her for at least 10 minutes). It is not, as the blogger frequently refers to, evidence. Not exclusively a USA trait, this happens also in many countries, but in a technologically advanced superpower like USA this attitude is more shocking, and maybe also more worldwide spread. You read a few comments. This is basically the book best kept secrets in condensed form full of outlandish theories. In fact, if someone was Hungry like the Wolf in this courtroom, it was a certain crime author who could already smell and taste the fortune coming her way after the publication of this juicy story. And that Ann Rule took advantage of the situation to sell her book. The Diane Downs' Case Was no Small Sacrifice On May 19, 1983, Elizabeth Diane Downs and her three small children were shot on a country road near Springfield, Oregon. Wrong. Bannon, a former adviser . At the time, among 49 prisoners denied parole, the board had given only four inmates, including Downs, a 10-year wait. I must humbly admit that I had not questioned the facts of the case before readily accepting this image of Diane as a cold blooded killer. Read More: Where Is Robert Knickerbocker Now? The american system often reminds me of what Charles Dickens talked about in his novels. Diane Downs was convicted because she didn't appear "sorry enough" during her TV appearances. She says she was outside the car n watched the man shoot her children n then the only adult n person who could tell police about him only gets a shot in the arm n takes time to bandage her arm. This was ridiculed countless times in the media, but frankly, it can be a very honorable endeavor, depending onhow you want to look at it. Im all for justice, reviewing facts and overturning corrupt decisions. Mr. Foster Carers says either Australia or England to me. She would have been released under strict conditions with the support of her family and under the care of a mental health specialist. How about dads side of the family? The states own witness, Dr. George Suckow and Dr. Polly Jamison denounced Prosecutor Hugis practice as improper and unethical (Appendix 101 and 104). I understand that the authorities were afraid to leave the two remaining children under her care if they thought she was guilty, but they could have been released to the grandparents or other blood relatives with supervised visits from their mom considering that she was not charged with any crime. A new trial would be out of the question, so to me, parole would be the solution. The forensic evidence alone is absolutely weak. The next day, on June 16, 1983, CSD terminated Dianes visitations with her children altogether. Page 10 of Case History. Her son ended up in jail and ONeils children accused him of neglect and bad parenting. Distractify is a registered trademark. She said She did it. I would like to raise the numerous issues with this blog. And in fact this would have been about the time that Charlene broke a bottle of liquor that you had. Diane was pregnant during the trial so if found not guilty, how would she have regained the love of her life? They were treated very badly in this matter. Instead of shooting the little kids, why didnt the carjacker/killer (CK) simply shoot DD dead and take her car? rudy francisco rifle analysis / ford employee profit sharing 2022 / why didn't steve downs get custody. I am not saying that Diane was a saint or Ann Rule a demon. That doesnt make it true. Nuts maybe, but not threatening. I wish she could get a new look. The inconsistencies and obvious lack of evidence in this case should have called for a wider investigation instead of solely focusing on their prime suspect. Litigating at the Supreme Court in . Lack of blood spatter is not evidence of innocence Especially when a shooter is leaning in and shooting into a box (car) while standing outside. I am pointing them out. Why am I not arguing the facts of the trial? So the prosecutor adopted the kids? Her family supported her. Ann Rule did not leave a great legacy as far as honest reporting goes, and she is not the only one to have commercialized a criminal case for personal gain. I actually can relate to things she did and was like, especially chasing after a guy that dont want youi did one night stands during my chase..to try to get over himits was a dumb idea and really made things worse, but it made sense at the time. I am a true crime junkie. It is not my point. Maybe she wanted to buy drugs. I agree. There was no question in Dianes mind that Knick would take another mistress if she married him, and that hed move on again. I agree in both cases they were high profile cases. As was his habit, Knick failed to take into consideration what Diane or his wife had to say on the matter. I encourage you to read all the facts before being so sure that she was guilty or that she acted alone. Diane nowhad the title ofdangerous offender. It deserved as much attention as a Unicorn, a song or all the other hearsay floating around because at least, they came from real people signing official documents. The blog I read is all about the improprieties and flat out misconduct in Dianes trial (and the way Ann Rule profited off of it with fiction). She should have had the lawyer of her choice and if they wanted to charge her with the crimes, they should have stuck with what evidence and circumstances they had. In addition, the children were suffering life-changing physical and mental trauma, which would take years to heal. You said that the absence of both prove she couldnt have been to shooter and you claim it takes real scrubbing to remove GSR. The lovely Farrah Fawcett who played in the movie Small Sacrifices was known for her epic battles with lover Ryan ONeil. Dianewas jealous ofthe other woman, but Robert Knickerbockers wife said that she foundher rather friendly during their encounter. As usual, Diane had resorted to the soothing comfort of a pregnancy to pretend life would get better; she would create a nest around her, come hell or high water. I am not biased. McPherron: And you had no contact with her . There was never a real motive for the crime even if the State insisted that Diane wanted to be free to pursue her love interest; using her journals to support theirclaim. Thanks again. And their plan worked. He separated from his wife and was going to follow Diane who, by now, had decided to move and work in Oregon to be closer to her parents. Instead, it is Diane who fought to keep her children. One of the flaws was the relationship between the DA and the children. Her character was also too much on the forefront. By the time the incident had happened, it seems as if the two had parted ways . Mission accomplished. To have separated Christie from her brother and the rest of the family to be able to get her mom was unconscionable. I think DD is guilty, but I also think her trial was far from due process, and that is the important issue. Brewer changed his mind. Children imitate their parents every move. why didn't steve downs get custodylagu sekolah minggu bahasa inggris Opinion Fox News's blackout of Jan. 6 points to a hidden crisis for Democrats The not-so-shocking revelation that Fox News will not carry House committee hearings about the insurrection is yet another sign that right-wing media will go to extraordinary lengths to shield . The DA that put away their mom is not an appropriate placement choice. Just goes to show how difficult it is sometimes to find the truth. I especially loved reading everyones comments. I would like to believe this is the truth. She is nowhere near being paroled and if she admitted guilt, I am not even convinced they would release her. That hurt our family deeply. It gave Anne Rule carte blanche to legally use these labels in her book and it stuck. They are set in stone and people refuse to see it any other way. Yes, I usually answer the emails I get about the blogs. I like to believe the best about people too but there are certain things that absolutely cant be ignored. They were not truth seekers and enjoyed a nice burning at the stake instead. Ive done my research. I ndicted money launderer and noted coup enthusiast Steve Bannon has refused to sit for a deposition in front of the January 6 Select Committee. ?.the fact you are ignoring something SO OBVIOUS is a red flag. One should also wonder why their biological father who was so eager to bash his ex on the stand was not given custody, and did not stay in contact with his two remaining children: relevance? From the time Diane was a teenager, when a physician ordered visterol in an emergency room situation, it has been documented again and again that sedatives ingested while Diane is in pain, provoke a chemically induced hysteria in her. Yes Gigi, the same judge who had removed the children was also presiding over her trial. I have no idea whether or not she was guilty of the crime. I am a firm believer of where there is smoke there is fire. And after Diane left Arizona she didnt call Knick to inquire about his love, but rather about when he would repay the $500 (Appendix 81, pages 1479-1480). I agree that the phone call from Angel was totally inappropriate. why didn t steve downs get custody - Central Texas Gardening Blog Mostly, because it was poorly investigated and they focused on Diane solely the minute they met her. Late one May night in 1983, Diane Downs sped into an emergency room dropoff in Springfield, Ore., with a horrifying story to tell. That conflict of interest alone would incline Christie to testify against her mother. 2023 Cinemaholic Inc. All rights reserved. In fact, if appropriate family is found, termination is not required. I am not sure of the exact timing of Dianes accusations but the Downs family did not only include the grandparents and they were never considered even before this nonsense. Either way, it appears to be a conflict of interest. Hugi got the evidence needed to convict after numerous meetings with Christie. Who Wore it Better? Gosh Donna, you really dont have a clue. Why didnt they mention that he said a bad man and whatever else in his condition when they knew it was not possible? She never hurt anyone in the process of escaping. The guy should have walked away from the case or from adopting them. Click here to read the complaint. During closing arguments, Fred Hugi said that the murder weapon used by Diane was a Ruger, and the state had the model number and the bill of sale. Their haste to go to trial created this mess and lingering doubts. Also, the title of the website clearly demonstrates an inherit bias. They checked her nails to see if she could have buried the gun and they were clean. Ask them what they did to a good man. While I appreciate your empathy for the victims of this crime, I have to wonder if all murderers should be locked up their entire life? If you read the blog, it is because of the lie told by prosecutor Hugi that ignored the assessment of her therapist Dr. Jamison and was condemned by the psychiatrist that they were convinced to find her guilty. What about the son saying that man and nurses noting that. I dont know the woman. It should have been investigated further. I research cases that in my opinion, were poorly tried. Our legal system is not perfect. And other inmates were released with worst backgrounds. Their life without parole sentences are a dime a dozen and so randomly used that it beats any notion of justice for all. The police admitting on the stand that after 2 weeks, they stopped looking at suspects appears to be a fact. 2) You mention her youngest daughter, and how Ann made sure she only heard negative information about Diane. The board said that her mental or emotional disorder makes her a danger to society. I lived through the media coverage. And Robert Knickerbocker became one of her lovers. If the police department had done their job properly, I would not have written this blog, no matter the outcome. Robert and Diane even decided toget matching rose tattoos, but as soon as the ink on her tattoo was dry, he refused to get his done. The blog tries to bring balance and more objectivity to a case that was TOTALLY one sided and still is. A trial should be based on facts and solid direct or circumstantial evidence. This video has Dianes attorney, Jim Jagger, at 1 minutes and 20 seconds that might have some good shots. Surprisingly, Fred Hugi actually looks quite different. why didn't steve downs get custody. That is not a quick process and is very invasive to a familys privacy. You can check this link and go online to see her picture with Cheryl and the rest of the family. What about the terror of being interrogated by strangers and separated from her family? All of it is explained in the blog you didnt bother reading. I know that most people think she is guilty. If there is one thing Diane knew about her lover, is that he was fickle and did not like trouble of any kind. She had been isolated from her whole family and being unethically interrogated. TOP 10 why didn t steve downs get custody BEST and NEWEST Jennifer Hudson didn't lose custody of her son David Jr. because she was an unfit parent, but rather because her work commitments meant she had to temporarily relocate to film The Voice UK. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPLkIcSzftE&ab_channel=DianeDownsArchives. A number of them were clearly . So there was a transfer, but nothing else was found. Her quest for love had landed her into an unstable and loveless marriage. She is supposed to be locked up for murder, etc. Like I said, the 2 years make it a bit more of a gray area. Halo's Master Chief TV Show Actor Won't Try To Replicate Steve Downes
Vivaser Of Lakewood, Will New York State Offer Early Retirement Incentive 2022?, What Factors Led To The Rise Of Labor Unions?, Michael Bryant Obituary, Articles W