slax 15.0 boots I'm not sure how Ventoy can make use of that boot process, because, in a Secure Boot enabled environment, all UEFI:NTFS accomplishes is that it allows you to chain load a Secure Boot signed UEFI boot loader from an NTFS partition, and that's it. Windows 11 21h2 x64 Hebrew - Successfully tested on UFEI. Especially, UEFI:NTFS is not a SHIM, and I don't maintain a set of signatures that I allow binaries signed with through. Ventoy About File Checksum 1. You can press left or right arrow keys to scroll the menu. @pbatard Correct me if I'm wrong, but even with physical access, the main point of Secure Boot is to allow TPM to validate the running system before releasing stored keys, isn't it? I assume that file-roller is not preserving boot parameters, use another iso creation tool. Porteus-CINNAMON-v4.0-x86_64.iso - 321 MB, APorteus-MULTI-v20.03.19-x86_64.iso - 400 MB, Fedora-Security-Live-x86_64-32_Beta-1.2.iso - 1.92 GB, Paragon_Hard_Disk_Manager_15_Premium_10.1.25.1137_WinPE_x64.iso - 514 MB, pureos-9.0-plasma-live_20200328-amd64.hybrid.iso - 1.65 GB, pfSense-CE-2.4.5-RELEASE-amd64.iso - 738 MB, FreeBSD-13.0-CURRENT-amd64-20200319-r359106-disc1.iso - 928 MB, wifislax64-1.1-final.iso - 2.18 GB Thnx again. And, for any of this to work, Ventoy would still need to independently solve the problem of allowing unsigned bootloaders pass through when Secure Boot is enabled @ventoy @chromer030 hello. The latest version of the open source tool Ventoy supports an option to bypass the Windows 11 requirements check during installation of the operating system. I guess this is a classic error 45, huh? Tested below ISOs on HP ENVY x360- 13-ag0007au (1st-gen Ryzen Mobile convertible laptop, BIOS F.46 Rev.A) with Ventoy 1.0.08 final release in UEFI secure boot mode: Nice job and thanks a lot for this neat tool! This means current is UEFI mode. Ventoy supports both BIOS Legacy and UEFI, however, some ISO files do not support UEFI mode. size: 589 (617756672 byte) It should be the default of Ventoy, which is the point of this issue. They boot from Ventoy just fine. also for my friend's at OpenMandriva *waaavvvveee* Optional custom shim protocol registration (not included in this build, creates issues). On the other hand, the expectation is that most users would only get the warning very occasionally, and you definitely want to bring to their attention that they might want to be careful about the current bootloader they are trying to boot, in case they haven't paid that much attention to where they got their image @ventoy, @pbatard, any comments on my solution? You can install Ventoy to USB drive, Removable HD, SD Card, SATA HDD, SSD, NVMe . ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefidibujo del sistema nervioso y sus partes para nios ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefi. ElementaryOS boots just fine. 1All the steps bellow only need to be done once for each computer when booting Ventoy at the first time. So I don't really see how that could be used to solve the specific problem we are being faced with here, because, however you plan to use UEFI:NTFS when Secure Boot is enabled, your target (be it Ventoy or something else) must be Secure Boot signed. So even when someone physically unplugs my SSD and installs a malicious bootloader/OS to it, it won't be able to decrypt the main OS partition. So, Ventoy can also adopt that driver and support secure boot officially. Hi, Gentoo LiveDVD doesn't work, when I try to boot it, It's showing up the GRUB CLI I've been trying to do something I've done a milliion times before: This has always worked for me. However, Ventoy can be affected by anti-virus software and protection programs. Add firmware packages to the firmware directory. Menu. I still don't know why it shouldn't work even if it's complex. No bootfile found for UEFI! When secure boot is enabled, only .efi/kernel/drivers need to be signed. This was not considered Secure Boot violation as ExitBootServices() was called prior to booting the kernel. EFI Blocked !!!!!!! Time-saving software and hardware expertise that helps 200M users yearly. Are you using an grub2 External Menu (F6)? I've made another patched preloader with Secure Boot support. Latest Laptop UEFI 64+SECURE BOOT ON Blocked message. preloader-for-ventoy-prerelease-1.0.40.zip @steve6375 I've mounted that partition and deleted EFI folder but it's still recognized as EFI, both in Windows Disk Management and the BIOS, just doesn't boot anymore. If you use the Linux kernel's EFI stub loader or ELILO, you may need to store your kernel on the ESP, so creating an ESP on the large end of the scale is advisable. So, yeah, if you have access to to the hardware, then Secure Boot, TPM or whatever security measure you currently have on consumer-grade products, is pretty much useless because, as long as you can swap hardware components around, or even touch the hardware (to glitch the RAM for instance), then unless the TPM comes with an X-Ray machine that can scan and compare hardware components, you're going to have a very hard time plugging all the many holes through which a dedicated attacker can gain access to your data. Option 3: only run .efi file with valid signature. Freebsd has some linux compatibility and also has proprietary nvidia drivers. , Laptop based platform: Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI." UEFI64 Bootfile \EFI\Boot\bootx64.efi is present. GRUB mode fixed it! I'll think about it and try to add it to ventoy. Ventoy should only allow the execution of Secure Boot signed executables when Secure Boot is enabled, Microsoft's official Secure Boot signing requirements. ", same error during creating windows 7 I'm getting the same error when booting "Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-33-1.2.iso" or "pop-os_20.04_amd64_intel_8.iso" on either a new ThinkPad X13 or T14s using Ventoy 1.0.31 UEFI. Maybe because of partition type In Windows, some processes will occupy the USB drive, and Ventoy2Disk.exe cannot obtain the control right of the USB drive, so that the device cannot be listed. I made a larger MEMZ.img and that runs on Easy2Boot and grubfm in VBOX but it goes wrong booting via Ventoy for some reason. la imagen iso,bin, etc debe ser de 64 bits sino no la reconoce Menu Option-->Secure Boot Support for Ventoy2Disk.exe and -s option for Ventoy2Disk.sh I'm considering two ways for user to select option 1. Edit: Disabling Secure Boot didn't help. An encoding issue, perhaps (for the text)? You can open the ISO in 7zip and look for yourself. And we've already been over whether USB should be treated differently than internal SATA or NVMe (which, in your opinion it should, and which in mine, and I will assert the majority of people who enable Secure Boot, it shouldn't). That's actually very hard to do, and IMO is pointless in Ventoy case. Many thanks! Ventoy is an open source tool that lets you create a bootable USB drive for ISO files. OpenMandrivaLx.4.0-beta.20200426.7145-minimal.x86_64.iso - 400 MB, en_windows_10_business_editions_version_1909_updated_march_2020_x64_dvd_b193f738.iso | 5 GB For instance, if you produce digitally signed software for Windows, to ensure that your users can validate that when they run an application, they can tell with certainty whether it comes from you or not, you really don't want someone to install software on the user computer that will suddenly make applications that weren't signed by you look as if they were signed by you. I think it's ok as long as they don't break the secure boot policy. It's the job of Ventoy's custom GRUB to ensure that what is being chainloaded is Secure Boot compliant because that's what users will expect from a trustworthy boot application in a Secure Boot environment. Using Ventoy-1.0.08, ubuntudde-20.04-amd64-desktop.iso is still unable to boot under uefi. Minor one: when you try to start unsigned .efi executable, error message is shown for a very brief time and quickly disappears. How to mount the ISO partition in Linux after boot ? FreeNAS-11.3-U2.1.iso (FreeBSD based) tested using ventoy-1.0.08 hung during boot in both bios and uefi at the following error; da1: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present Hey, I have encountered the same problem and I found that after deleting the "System Volume Information" folder on Ventoy partition of the USB disk, it can boot now. Now, that one can currently break the trust chain somewhere down the line, by inserting a malicious program at the first level where the trust stops being validated, which, incidentally, as a method (since I am NOT calling Ventoy malicious here) is very similar to what Ventoy is doing for Windows boot, is irrelevant to the matter, because one can very much conceive an OS that is being secured all the way (and, once again, if Microsoft were to start doing just that, then that would most likely mark the end of being able to use Ventoy with Windows ISOs since it would no longer be able to inject an executable that isn't signed by Microsoft as part of the boot process) and that validates the signature of every single binary it runs along the way which means that the trust chain needs to start somewhere and (as far as user providable binaries are concerned) that trust chain starts with Secure Boot. Yes, Ventoy does work within UEFI mode and offers a default secure boot feature. 5. and reboot.pro.. and to tinybit specially :) I will not release 1.1.0 until a relatively perfect secure boot solution. Joined Jul 18, 2020 Messages 4 Trophies 0 . If the ISO file name is too long to displayed completely. may tanong po ulit ako yung pc ko po " no bootfile found for uefi image does not support x64 uefi" i am using ventoy galing po sa linux ko, gusto ko po isang laptop ko gawin naman windows, ganyan po lagi naka ilang ulit na po ako, laptop ko po kasi ayaw na bumalik sa windows mula nung ginawa ko syang linux, nagtampo siguro kaya gusto ko na po ibalik sa windows salamat po sa makakasagot at sa . If you have a faulty USB stick, then youre likely to encounter booting issues. If you want you can toggle Show all devices option, then all the devices will be in the list. It means that the secure boot solution doesn't work with your machine, so you need to turn off the option, and disable secure boot in the BIOS. 5. extservice Hi FadeMind, the woraround for that Problem with WinPE10_8_Sergei_Strelec_x86_x64_2019.12.28_English.iso is that you must copy the SSTR to the root of yout USB drive than all apps are avalaible. So as @pbatard said, the secure boot solution is a stopgap and that's why Ventoy is still at 1.0.XX. Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. (I updated to the latest version of Ventoy). function gennr(){var n=480678,t=new Date,e=t.getMonth()+1,r=t.getDay(),a=parseFloat("0. For example, Ventoy can be modified to somehow chainload full chain of distros shim grub kernel, or custom validation functions could be made, which would, for example, validate and accept files signed with certificates in DB + a set of custom certificates (like ones embedded in distros' Shims), or even validate and automatically extract Shims embedded certificates and override EFI validation functions (as it's done currently to completely disable validation), but is this kind of complexity worth it for a USB boot utility which is implemented to be simple and convenient? Getting the same error with Arch Linux. 1. Something about secure boot? relativo a la imagen iso a utilizar Currently when boot the ISO file failed as a Virtual CDROM, Ventoy will try to parse the grub configuration file inside the ISO file and try to boot it direclty with. Turned out archlinux-2021.06.01-x86_64 is not compatible. Best Regards. to your account. You don't need anything special to create a UEFI bootable Arch USB. And, unfortunately, with Ventoy as it stands, this whole trust mechanism is indeed broken, because you can take an official Windows installation ISO, insert a super malicious UEFI bootloader (that performs a Windows installation while also installing malware) and, even if users have Secure Boot enabled (and added Ventoy in Mok manager), they will not be alerted at all that they are running a malicious bootloader, whereas this is the whole point of Secure Boot! size 5580453888 bytes (5,58 GB) when the user Secure Boots via MokManager - even when booting signed efi files of Ubuntu or Windows? Already have an account? But when I try to boot it with ventoy it does not boot and says the message "No bootfile found for UEFI". Insert a USB flash drive with at least 8 GB of storage capacity into your computer. Boot net installer and install Debian. Feedback is welcome If your tested hardware or image file is not listed here, please tell me and I will be glad to add it to the table here. But even the user answer "YES, I don't care, just boot it." debes activar modo uefi en el bios Test these ISO files with Vmware firstly. So maybe Ventoy also need a shim as fedora/ubuntu does. It is pointless to try to enforce Secure Boot from a USB drive. In Windows, Ventoy2Disk.exe will only list the device removable and in USB interface type by default. Ventoy2Disk.exe always failed to install ? Follow the guide below to quickly find a solution. always used Archive Manager to do this and have never had an issue. It woks only with fallback graphic mode. Tested on 1.0.77. I am not using a grub external menu. Ventoy is open-source software that allows users to create ISO, WIM, IMG, VHS(x), and EFI files onto a bootable USB drive. Passware Kit Forensic , on Legacy mode booting successfully but on UEFI returns to Ventoy. then there is no point in implementing a USB-based Secure Boot loader. Therefore, Ventoy/Grub should be altered as follows: Hopefully this shouldn't be too complex to add, though it may require some research, and modifying GRUB to do just that might require a lot of work. No bootfile found for UEFI, maybe the image doesnt support ia32 uefi error, asus t100ta Kinda solved: Cant install arch, but can install linux mint 64 bit. I remember that @adrian15 tried to create a sets of fully trusted chainload chains Click Bootable > Load Boot File. In the install program Ventoy2Disk.exe. Win10UEFI+GPTWin10UEFIWin7 Anything Debian-based fails to boot for me across two computers and several versions of Ventoy. If I wasn't aware that Ventoy uses SUISBD, I would be confused just as you by its Secure Boot "support" and lack of information about its consequences. And that is the right thing to do. Any progress towards proper secure boot support without using mokmanager? try 1.0.09 beta1? md5sum 6b6daf649ca44fadbd7081fa0f2f9177 There are many kinds of WinPE. SB works using cryptographic checksums and signatures. GRUB2, from my experiences does this automatically. 10 comments andycuong commented on Mar 17, 2021 completed meeuw mentioned this issue on Jul 31, 2021 [issue]: Can't boot Ventoy UEFI Native (Without CSM) on HP ProBook 640g1 #1031 ", https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_mYChRFanLEdyttDvT-cn6zH0o6KX7Th/view Finally, click on "64-bit Download" and it will start downloading Windows 11 from Microsoft's server. Option 2 will be the default option. Thus, being able to check that an installer or boot loader wasn't tampered with is not a "nice bonus" but is something that must be enforced always in a Secure Boot enabled environment, regardless of the type of media you are booting from, because Secure Boot is very much designed to help users ensure that, when they install an OS, and provided that OS has a chain of trust that extends all the way, any alteration of any of the binary code that the OS executes, be it as part of the installation or when the OS is running, will be detected and reported to the user and prevent the altered binary code to run. Thanks. Remain what in the install program Ventoy2Disk.exe . The MEMZ virus nyan cat as an image file produces a very weird result, It also happens when running Ventoy in QEMU, The MEMZ virus nyan cat as an image file produces a very weird result 2. The current release of Slax (slax-64bit-11.2.1.iso) fails to boot using UEFI64 using ventoy with the error message: da1: quirks=0x2. if it's possible please add UEFI support for this great distro. When the user select option 1. Guiding you with how-to advice, news and tips to upgrade your tech life. So that means that Ventoy will need to use a different key indeed. Hi, thanks for your repley boot i have same error after menu to start hdclone he's go back to the menu with a black windows saying he's loading the iso file to mem and that it freez. @shasheene of Rescuezilla knows about the problem and they are investigating. I would say that it probably makes sense to first see what LoadImage()/StarImage() let through in an SB enabled environment (provided that this is what Ventoy/GRUB uses behind the scenes, which I'm not too sure about), and then decide if it's worth/possible to let users choose to run unsigned bootloaders. Does it work on these machines (real or emulated) by booting it from a CDR / .iso image? Thus, on a system where Secure Boot is enabled, users should rightfully expect to be alerted if the EFI bootloader of an ISO booted through Ventoy is not Secure Boot signed or if its signature doesn't validate. 3. However, some ISO files dont support UEFI mode so booting those files in UEFI will not work. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5NFuDCZQ00 screenshots if possible and leave it up to the user. I'm not sure whether Ventoy should try to boot Linux kernel without any verification in this case (. VentoyU allows users to update and install ISO files on the USB drive. KANOTIX uses a hybrid ISO layout, it definitely has X64 UEFI in ISO9660 and FAT12 (usually 1MiB offset). Most of modern computers come with Secure Boot enabled by default, which is a requirement for Windows 10 certification process. Sorry for my ignorance. list vol - select vol of EFI (in my case nr 14) as illustrated - assign - EFI drive is mounted as Q: Also possible is: After booting with Win10XPE from RAMDISK the Hidden EFI Driv This seem to be disabled in Ventoy's custom GRUB). Adding an efi boot file to the directory does not make an iso uefi-bootable. On my other Laptop from other Manufacturer is booting without error. Yet, that is technically what Ventoy does if you enrol it for Secure Boot, as it makes it look like any bootloader, that wasn't signed by Microsoft, was signed by Microsoft. Rik. Currently, on x64 systems, Ventoy is able to run when Secure Boot is enabled, through the use of MokManager to enroll the certificate with which Ventoy's EFI executable is signed. wifislax64-2.1-final.iso - 2 GB, obarun-JWM-2020.03.01-x86_64.iso - 1.6 GB, MiniTool_Partition_Wizard_10.2.3_Technician_WinPE.iso - 350 MB, artix-cinnamon-s6-20200210-x86_64.iso - 1.88 GB, Parrot-security-4.8_x64.iso - 4.03 GB The file size will be over 5 GB. With ventoy, you don't need to format the disk over and over, you just need to copy the ISO/WIM/IMG/VHD (x)/EFI. Unsigned bootloader Linux ISOs or ISOs without UEFI support does not boot with Secure Boot enabled. @steve6375 Okay thanks. I think it's OK. Please refer: About Fuzzy Screen When Booting Window/WinPE. we have no ability to boot it unless we disable the secure boot because it is not signed. @steve6375 I have tried the latest release, but the bug still exist. all give ERROR on HP Laptop : It means that the secure boot solution doesn't work with your machine, so you need to turn off the option, and disable secure boot in the BIOS. So I think that also means Ventoy will definitely impossible to be a shim provider. They can choose to run a signed Ubuntu EFI file and Ventoy can change it's default function using scripts and file injection. Once here, scroll down and move to the "Download Windows 11 Disk Image (ISO) for x64 devices" section. Sign in It typically has the same name, but you can rename it to something else should you choose to do so. to your account, Hi ! @ventoy used Super UEFIinSecureBoot Disk files to disable UEFI file policy, that's the easiest way, but not a 'proper' one. ? Do I still need to display a warning message? This ISO file doesn't change the secure boot policy. Besides, you can try a linux iso file, for example ubuntu-20.04-desktop-amd64.iso, I have the same for Memtest86-4.3.7.iso and ipxe.iso but works fine with netboot.xyz-efi.iso (v2.0.17), manjaro-gnome-20.0.3-200606-linux56.iso, Windows10_PLx64_2004.iso and HBCD_PE_x64.iso (v1.0.1) Lenovo Ideapad Z580. Yes, at this point you have the same exact image as I have. It only causes problems. I'm not talking about CSM. This is definitely what you want. 6. In Linux, you need to specify the device to install Ventoy which can be a USB drive or local disk. Yes, anybody can make a UEFI bootloader that chain loads unsigned bootloaders with the express purpose of defeating Secure Boot. Have you tried grub mode before loading the ISO? When Secure Boot is enabled, BIOS boot (CSM) should not work at all, since it would completely defeat the purpose of only allowing signed executables to boot. Ventoy has added experimental support for IA32 UEFI since v1.0.30. It . and windows password recovery BootCD debes activar modo legacy en el bios-uefi PS: It works fine with original ventoy release (use UEFIinSecureBoot) when Secure boot is enabled. Open Rufus and select the USB flash drive under "Device" and select Extended Windows 11 Installation under Image option. All the .efi/kernel/drivers are not modified. they reviewed all the source code). So it is impossible to get these ISOs to work with ventoy without enabling legacy support in the bios settings? 8 Mb. You were able to use TPM for disk encryption long before Secure Boot, and rightfully so, since the process of storing and using data encryption keys is completely different from the process of storing and using trust chain keys to validate binary executables (being able to decrypt something is very different from being able to trust something). for grub modules, maybe I can pack all the modules into one grub.efi and for other efi files(e.g. Yes. Perform a scan to check if there are any existing errors on the USB. It's the BIOS that decides the boot mode not Ventoy. Download non-free firmware archive. Will polish and publish the code later. Still having issues? Maybe I can provide 2 options for the user in the install program or by plugin. Therefore, unless Ventoy makes it very explicit that "By enrolling Ventoy for Secure Boot, you understand that you are also granting anyone with the capability of running non Secure Boot enabled boot loaders on your computer, including potential malicious ones that would otherwise have been detected by Secure Boot", I will maintain that there is a rather important security issue that needs to be addressed. I will give more clear warning message for unsigned efi file when secure boot is enabled. 2There are two methods: Enroll Key and Enroll Hash, use whichever one. Maybe we should just ask the user 'This file is not signed by Microsoft for 'Secure Boot' - do you still wish to boot from it?' regular-cinnamon-latest-x86_64.iso - 1.1 GB, openSUSE-Tumbleweed-GNOME-Live-x86_64-Snapshot20200326-Media.iso - 852MB Won't it be annoying? However, after adding firmware packages Ventoy complains Bootfile not found. They all work if I put them onto flash drives directly with Rufus.